<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Democracy North Carolina Blog &#187; Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/category/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog</link>
	<description>Latest updates on Democracy North Carolina&#039;s activities, achievements and volunteer needs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 22:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Video Fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/05/17/lod-video-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/05/17/lod-video-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Feed & Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, James O’Keefe of Project Veritas released a 10-minute video allegedly documenting voter fraud in North Carolina, featuring two examples of non-citizens who voted in past elections. O’Keefe gained national attention for his cleverly edited videos attacking ACORN, and some in the NC media were ready to gobble up his latest offering. Fortunately, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, James O’Keefe of Project Veritas released a <strong><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/15/new-okeefe-video-exposes-non-citizens-on-voter-rolls-in-nc-voter-fraud-comfort-at-unc/">10-minute video</a></strong> allegedly documenting voter fraud in North Carolina, featuring two examples of non-citizens who voted in past elections. O’Keefe gained national attention for his cleverly edited videos attacking ACORN, and some in the NC media were ready to gobble up his latest offering. Fortunately, most reporters were a little cautious. Good thing. Several hours after the video’s release, <strong><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/05/15/484462/james-o-keefe-voter-fraud-north-carolina/">Think Progress revealed</a></strong> that one of O’Keefe’s alleged non-citizens was in fact a naturalized citizen and voted legally. O’Keefe is more provocateur than investigator.</p>
<p>There’s more: The next day, Think Progress corrected the story about <strong><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/05/16/485008/james-o-keefe-second-citizen/">the other person</a></strong>; he, too, is a citizen. The Project Veritas video never showed these voters admitting they were not citizens; instead, it used jury service excuse records that O’Keefe doesn’t understand and that are subject to human error. In fact, a <strong><a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/14/records-cate-edwards-claimed-she-wasnt-a-u-s-citizen-to-get-out-of-jury-duty/">rightwing blog</a></strong> had a field day this week, pointing out that Cate Edwards, daughter of John Edwards, is listed on the jury service excuse records in Orange County as “not [a] US citizen.” She&#8217;s no longer a resident of the county, but it turns out the citizenship remark was mistakenly added by a court clerk. The county clerk has apologized for the clerical mistake – they do happen.</p>
<p>Other claims in the Project Veritas video are misleading and false, and the whole operation may have committed more election violations than it supposedly uncovered, including impersonating a voter and unauthorized filming inside a polling place. The video’s actor was careful not to sign in as a voter – that’s a clear felony violation.</p>
<p>North Carolina has seen a string of claims about major problems with election records and illegal voters, going back to then state Auditor Les Merritt’s <strong><a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003485.php">misguided attack on</a></strong> the 2007 legislation that would permit Same-Day Registration. All these claims have proven false; existing safeguards are protecting the integrity of NC’s election process. Of course, no system dealing with millions of records and people is perfect and improvements can always be made. Indeed, we had many problems in the 2012 primary, but most were the result of poll worker error related to the complexity of ballot varieties, not holes in the election system that allow illegal voters to impact an election outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/05/17/lod-video-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Wal-Mart Way of Business</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/05/03/lod-wal-mart-way-of-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/05/03/lod-wal-mart-way-of-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 02:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wal-Mart is in the middle of a scandal involving allegations of massive bribery in Mexico – and the company is depending on the goodwill built through its generous donations to Congressional leaders of both parties to weather the storm; in other words, it’s using another form of bribery that has become standard practice for major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wal-Mart is in the middle of a scandal involving allegations of massive bribery in Mexico – and the company is depending on the goodwill built through its <strong><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/05/bentonvilles-influence-in-washingto.html">generous donations</a></strong> to Congressional leaders of both parties to weather the storm; in other words, it’s using another form of bribery that has become standard practice for major businesses, especially as they undergo more scrutiny for abusing their power. Wal-Mart has been the target of numerous complaints over the years as it has enriched the heirs of founder Sam Walton – several are now among the 10 richest individuals in the United States. Earlier this week, the company <strong><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/02/walmart-overtime-labor-department-settlement_n_1470543.html">agreed to pay</a></strong> nearly $5 million in back pay and damages to thousands of workers it had cheated out of overtime pay. That amount pales next to the more than $600 million Wal-Mart agreed to pay to settle dozens of labor-related cases in 2008. Apparently it learned the wrong lesson from that experience, i.e., cheating is cheaper than doing the right thing. Would its owners be so recalcitrant if they couldn’t use protection money to bribe the system in their favor? They are already spending big-time in the 2012 election so they never have to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/05/03/lod-wal-mart-way-of-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Sick for Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/25/lod-sick-for-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/25/lod-sick-for-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 02:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The multi-part series in the News &#38; Observer about NC hospitals will make you sick. Today’s part adds the money-in-politics dimension to the profile of heartless institutions with unbelievable profit margins, hiding behind the respectable shield of non-profit charitable service. Rep. Dale Folwell, the Republican House Speaker Pro-Tem, says his effort to cap a sales [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The multi-part series in the <em>News &amp; Observer</em> about NC hospitals will make you sick. <strong><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/04/24/2022065/north-carolina-hospitals-build.html">Today’s part</a></strong> adds the money-in-politics dimension to the profile of heartless institutions with unbelievable profit margins, hiding behind the respectable shield of non-profit charitable service. Rep. Dale Folwell, the Republican House Speaker Pro-Tem, says his effort to cap a sales tax windfall for hospitals went nowhere fast last year. “The reason this bill never got a hearing is because big money bottled it up,” he said. Today’s paper also <strong><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/04/25/2021949/unwise-outsourcing-of-prison-health.html">includes an op-ed</a></strong> on the dangers of turning the health-care management of prison inmates over to for-profit corporations that use political corruption wherever they go to turn state resources into enormous private gain. Not that North Carolina’s non-profit hospitals do much better with prison care; the N&amp;O shows they routinely charge the state three times their actual costs to treat sick inmates. Sure seems like a crime, but who will threaten these smiling hospital managers with a prison term?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/25/lod-sick-for-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Justice Over Bias</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/20/lod-justice-over-bia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/20/lod-justice-over-bia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 01:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a historic decision today, Superior Court Judge Gregory Weeks found that prosecutors deliberately excluded qualified black jurors from serving on the jury in the case of death row inmate Marcus Robinson. The hearing was the first to apply North Carolina’s landmark Racial Justice Act. Following the law’s directives, the judge resentenced Robinson to life [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a historic decision today, Superior Court Judge Gregory Weeks found that prosecutors <strong><a href="http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/11005360/">deliberately excluded</a></strong> qualified black jurors from serving on the jury in the case of death row inmate Marcus Robinson. The hearing was the first to apply North Carolina’s landmark Racial Justice Act. Following <strong><a href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2012/04/20/racial-justice-act-lives-up-to-its-name/">the law’s directives</a></strong>, the judge resentenced Robinson to life without the possibility of parole because unrefuted evidence showed that racial discrimination infected Robinson’s prosecution, consistent with a broader statistical pattern of racial bias in jury selection across the state. &#8220;The evidence should serve as a clear signal of the need for reform in capital jury selection proceedings in the future,&#8221; said the Cumberland County judge. &#8220;The very integrity of the court is jeopardized when a prosecutor&#8217;s discrimination invites cynicism respecting the jury’s neutrality and undermines public confidence.&#8221; The 167-page decision <strong><a href="http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102437356859-148/M++Robinson+RJA+Order.pdf">is here</a></strong>.  The decision offers hope that a broken system at the heart of a democratic society can be rebuilt to treat everyone fairly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/20/lod-justice-over-bia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: From the Horse&#8217;s Mouth</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/06/lod-from-the-horses-mouth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/06/lod-from-the-horses-mouth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 02:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizens United Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this hour-long production, the radio documentary “This American Life” manages to get Washington politicians and lobbyists saying the worst things possible about themselves, political corruption and the all-consuming money chase. Amazing! Who needs more evidence of the need for fundamental change? It begins with the tape of a shakedown fundraising call from a member of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this <strong><a href="http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/461/take-the-money-and-run-for-office">hour-long production</a></strong>, the radio documentary “This American Life” manages to get Washington politicians and lobbyists saying the worst things possible about themselves, political corruption and the all-consuming money chase. Amazing! Who needs more evidence of the need for fundamental change? It begins with the tape of a shakedown fundraising call from a member of Congress to a developer, proceeds with similar candor through a dozen interviews, and ends with Sen. John McCain&#8217;s comments about the Supreme Court&#8217;s sarcasm and stupidity in the <em>Citizens United </em>case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/04/06/lod-from-the-horses-mouth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: State Integrity Index</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/28/lod-state-integrity-index/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/28/lod-state-integrity-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you’ve heard about the State Integrity Investigation that scored each state on the strength of its laws and practices governing campaign finances, lobbying regulations, ethics, access to government records, redistricting, etc.  Overall, North Carolina earned a C- and ranked 18th best among the 50 states, but in some areas it scored an A, in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you’ve heard about the State Integrity Investigation that scored each state on the strength of its laws and practices governing campaign finances, lobbying regulations, ethics, access to government records, redistricting, etc.  Overall, North Carolina earned a C- and ranked 18<sup>th</sup> best among the 50 states, but in some areas it scored an A, in others an F. Here’s a link to <strong><a href="http://www.stateintegrity.org/northcarolina_story_subpage">the narrative</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.stateintegrity.org/north_carolina">detailed tables</a></strong> about North Carolina. NC project coordinator Adam Hochberg begins the narrative with a story: “When an influential North Carolina lawmaker named Stephen LaRoque helped sponsor and pass a 2011 bill loosening regulations on billboards, he was the co-owner of five billboards and president of a firm that owned four others. But when LaRoque asked the North Carolina Ethics Commission to review his key legislative role, it found no conflict, citing what it called a “safe harbor” stemming from the fact that his law would benefit everyone owning billboards. The case reflected what many analysts say is the prevailing state of North Carolina’s ethics regulations: A lengthy set of rules has been enacted to help keep public officials honest, but enforcement has sometimes not been strict. They also complain that the extensive rules haven’t adequately curbed the influence of monied interests on state policymaking.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/28/lod-state-integrity-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Toxic Mix in Raleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/22/lod-toxic-mix-in-raleigh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/22/lod-toxic-mix-in-raleigh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite promises of cleaning up what it called a “pay-to-play culture in Raleigh,” the new leadership in the General Assembly has done nothing to strengthen ethics or campaign finance laws. It hasn’t even enacted stronger disclosure laws to help the public’s right to know how money flows through the political system. Instead, as the Independent Weekly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite promises of cleaning up what it called a “pay-to-play culture in Raleigh,” the new leadership in the General Assembly has done nothing to strengthen ethics or campaign finance laws. It hasn’t even enacted stronger disclosure laws to help the public’s right to know how money flows through the political system. Instead, as the <strong><a href="http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/despite-gop-promises-to-clean-up-campaign-finance-its-as-dirty-as-ever/Content?oid=2920275"><em>Independent Weekly</em> details</a></strong>, the Republican leadership in the NC House now appears to embrace a <em>quid pro quo</em> approach to passing legislation – campaign money is being traded for favorable public policy. Keep your eye on what happens next with proposed legislation to gut North Carolina’s regulation of chemicals pumped into the air by utilities, manufacturers and others. Will the millions invested in NC politics by the toxics lobby overcome our current public health standards? The NC Coastal Federation has a two-part profile (<strong><a href="http://www.nccoast.org/Article.aspx?k=1f97d96d-b2fd-4dd7-9ab3-8cefa6237c30">part one</a>, <a href="http://www.nccoast.org/Article.aspx?k=7a537e2b-076f-4799-a412-f730dc97240a">part two</a></strong>) of what’s at stake, who’s involved, and why you should care about the outcome of a General Assembly committee considering this legislation today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/22/lod-toxic-mix-in-raleigh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Broadband Bandits</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/21/lod-broadband-bandits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/21/lod-broadband-bandits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report by the National Institute on Money in State Politics examines the money behind the telecommunications industry’s recent success in passing legislation to restrict local governments from building broadband networks that hooked local businesses and residents to the Internet, even in areas long ignored by the private providers. According to the report, “The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.followthemoney.org/press/ReportView.phtml?r=484&amp;utm_campaign=nc-broadband-report"><strong>new report</strong> </a>by the National Institute on Money in State Politics examines the money behind the telecommunications industry’s recent success in passing legislation to restrict local governments from building broadband networks that hooked local businesses and residents to the Internet, even in areas long ignored by the private providers. According to the report, “The state’s two biggest cable providers, Time Warner Cable and CenturyLink, along with the North Carolina Cable and Telecommunications Association (NCCTA), aggressively lobbied for the bill and were prominent campaign donors. . . . Republican lawmakers and those who held key leadership positions, sponsored the bill, and/or who voted in favor of the bill received considerably more campaign contributions from the telecommunication donors than did their colleagues. For example, lawmakers who voted in favor of HB 129 received on average 76 percent more than the average received by those who voted against the bill. The four primary sponsors of the bill received an average of $9,438 each, more than double the $3,658 given on average to lawmakers who did not sponsor the bill.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/21/lod-broadband-bandits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Trickle-Down Immorality</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/19/lod-trickle-down-immorality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/19/lod-trickle-down-immorality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week brought a flurry of reporting about the moral decay of America&#8217;s economic and political culture; the politics of greed is at the heart of the problem and the right target for the Occupy Movement and others. Somewhere in the 1980s, thanks to leadership at the top ranks of business and government, the transition accelerated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week brought a flurry of reporting about the moral decay of America&#8217;s economic and political culture; the politics of greed is at the heart of the problem and the right target for the Occupy Movement and others. Somewhere in the 1980s, thanks to leadership at the top ranks of business and government, the transition accelerated from John F. Kennedy’s “ask not what your country can do for you” to the current mantra of “what’s in it for me.” As Robert Reich knows well, immorality started at the top and trickled down. He writes, “There is <strong><a href="http://robertreich.org/post/19266068257">moral rot in America</a></strong> but it’s not found in the private behavior of ordinary people. It’s located in the public behavior of people who control our economy and are turning our democracy into a financial slush pump. It’s found in Wall Street fraud, exorbitant pay of top executives, financial conflicts of interest, insider trading, and the outright bribery of public officials through unlimited campaign donations.” Reich wants to focus for the moment on Republican co-conspirators of this sick selfishism, but a fuller analysis would bring in many Democrats as well; the politics of greed is now taken for granted as the way things are, the way to survive and prosper. An insider at Goldman Sachs wrote <strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.htm">a revealing op-ed</a></strong> attacking his “morally bankrupt” company as he resigned last week. For a horrific tale of corporate greed and corruption closer to home, read <em>Rolling Stone’s</em> <strong><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/bank-of-america-too-crooked-to-fail-20120314">cover story about Charlotte-based Bank of America</a></strong>, “a bank too crooked to fail.” Writes Matt Taibbi: “The threat posed by Bank of America isn&#8217;t just financial &#8211; it&#8217;s a full-blown assault on the American dream. Where&#8217;s the incentive to play fair and do well, when what we see rewarded at the highest levels of society is failure, stupidity, incompetence and meanness?” No wonder people will call this the decade of madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/19/lod-trickle-down-immorality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Fraud Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/07/lod-fraud-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/07/lod-fraud-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocates for requiring photo ID checks at the polls may delight in a news story breaking in Statesville, where a city council member is charged with voter fraud along with his sister and two of her family members. But all these voters cast ballots in their own names; requiring them to flash a photo document with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advocates for requiring photo ID checks at the polls may delight in <strong><a href="http://www2.statesville.com/news/2012/mar/06/council-members-standing-huggins-ar-2011411/">a news story</a></strong> breaking in Statesville, where a city council member is charged with voter fraud along with his sister and two of her family members. But all these voters cast ballots in their own names; requiring them to flash a photo document with their name would not have prevented the alleged cheating. So rather than help the ID advocates’ cause, this is another case that highlights how the <strong><a href="http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/gascripts/BillLookUp/BillLookUp.pl?Session=2011&amp;BillID=h351">proposed H-351</a></strong> will not really address fraud. As editorials this week in <strong><a href="http://www.thepilot.com/news/2012/mar/07/voter-id-bill-needs-to-remain-vetoed/">Southern Pines</a> </strong>and <strong><a href="http://www2.journalnow.com/news/opinion/2012/mar/05/wsopin01-editorial-voter-id-bill-would-create-prob-ar-2002753/">Winston-Salem</a></strong> newspapers make plain, the bill’s claim to “restore confidence in government” is bogus; it’s really about excluding honest people who the reigning political party doesn’t want to vote. Ironically, as <strong><a href="http://www.ncpolicywatch.com/2012/03/07/the-need-for-an-investigation/">a column</a></strong> about House Speaker Thom Tillis points out, his cozy relations with predatory lenders shows he has his own problems with accurate ID information and inspiring confidence in government. Should he, or the lenders, be investigated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/03/07/lod-fraud-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: The Good &amp; the Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/24/the-good-and-the-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/24/the-good-and-the-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick look from the news: Here are two examples of splendid editorials from North Carolina papers – one from the Charlotte Observer about good ways to hold Super PACs accountable for their wacko ads, and one from the Winston-Salem Journal about the bad ways Speaker Thom Tillis’ behaves as a leader in government.  And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick look from the news: Here are two examples of splendid editorials from North Carolina papers – one from the <em>Charlotte Observer</em> about <strong><a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/02/23/3036814/stand-up-for-truth-in-political.html">good ways</a></strong> to hold Super PACs accountable for their wacko ads, and one from the <em>Winston-Salem Journal</em> about the <strong><a href="http://www2.journalnow.com/news/opinion/2012/feb/23/wsopin01-tillis-ignored-democratic-process-in-oust-ar-1961456/">bad ways</a></strong> Speaker Thom Tillis’ behaves as a leader in government.  And then Facing South provides <strong><a href="http://southernstudies.org/2012/02/how-the-sc-dead-voters-hoax-collapsed.html">a case study</a></strong> of Fox News’ dogged use of misinformation in &#8220;news&#8221; reporting for its political agenda – the story of zombie voters in South Carolina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/24/the-good-and-the-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Hearing Voices</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/20/lod-hearing-voices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/20/lod-hearing-voices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civic Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NC House Speaker Thom Tillis deserves credit for his series of town hall meetings where he takes questions from the audience, including a sprinkling of dissenters. But his handlers apparently don’t want him exposed to an audience that is less overwhelmingly sympathetic to his message. Some voices are good, others are just not welcome, even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NC House Speaker Thom Tillis deserves credit for his series of town hall meetings where he takes questions from the audience, including a sprinkling of dissenters. But his handlers apparently don’t want him exposed to an audience that is less overwhelmingly sympathetic to his message. Some voices are good, others are just not welcome, even in the People’s House. Tillis’ office was behind the order by police to remove a group of quiet demonstrators from the second floor of the General Assembly last Thursday; they invoked a little-known rule to achieve their censorship. But NC Policy Watch <a href="http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2012/02/17/must-see-video-tillis-addresses-tea-partiers-in-same-spot-from-which-protesters-were-evicted/"><strong>found this video</strong></a> to show that the rule was not used to kick out a similar crowd of Tea Party supporters on the second floor, talking with Speaker Tillis. Policy Watch calls it “Tillis’ double standard.” The <em>News &amp; Observer</em> story about Thursday points out that a <strong><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/02/17/1861524/little-known-house-rule-limits.html">gaggle of Time Warner Cable executives</a></strong> were hovering around the Speaker’s office shortly before the demonstrators arrived, a normal sight. Voices of corporate special interests have long received favorable treatment in Raleigh. But that’s not to say we should not keep speaking up, organizing and demonstrating. An <strong><a href="http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/9-strategies-to-end-corporate-rule/the-peoples-media">article in Yes! magazine</a></strong>, which highlights failed leadership from both Democrats and Republicans, profiles how broad-based grassroots action can beat the corporate giants: ““The government’s rejection of the AT&amp;T/T-Mobile deal is an important reminder that the little guy can win in Washington.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/20/lod-hearing-voices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: McCrory&#8217;s Opening Miscue</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/09/lod-mccrorys-opening-miscue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/09/lod-mccrorys-opening-miscue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Feed & Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay to Play]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guess where Pat McCrory ended his swing across the state, announcing the official start of his campaign for governor as the candidate who will “turn North Carolina around” and end the “corruption” of the Democrats? The trip finished in Wilmington, with a large McCrory rally at a pool hall and grill &#8211; which is owned [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess where Pat McCrory ended his swing across the state, announcing the official start of his campaign for governor as the candidate who will “turn North Carolina around” and end the “corruption” of the Democrats? The <strong><a href="http://www.starnewsonline.com/article/20120202/ARTICLES/120209916">trip finished in Wilmington</a></strong>, with a large McCrory rally at a pool hall and grill &#8211; which is <strong><a href="http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?PitemId=8581216">owned by Steven Hebert</a></strong>, a donor to former House Speaker and convicted felon Jim Black, and which is stocked even today with video sweepstakes games from Southland Amusements, a company <strong><a href="http://www.secretary.state.nc.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?PitemId=4716049">run by Robert E. (Bobby) Huckabee III</a></strong>. Huckabee’s Southland Amusements &amp; Vending Inc. was at the center of the <strong><a href="http://www.democracy-nc.org/reports/researchreports/VideoPokerComplainJune2002revised.pdf">corruption complaint filed by Democracy North Carolina in July 2004</a></strong> against Jim Black’s network of video-poker donors. Back then, Hebert had Huckabee’s video poker machines in his bar; the two have been doing business together for years. Many of the individuals listed in the complaint funneled campaign money to Black through other donors, with or without their knowledge, including Huckabee’s sister and <a href="http://www.democracy-nc.org/reports/researchreports/v%20poker%20news%20articles%20expaned.pdf"><strong>Hebert’s wife-to-be, Holly Abbuhl</strong></a>. In testimony at the State Board of Elections into the complaint, it came out that Hebert gave Abbuhl the money to make her $1,500 donation to Black. Huckabee avoided testifying at the hearing by conveniently being out the country, but the taint of his dealings continues, as does the controversial evolution of video poker in North Carolina. It’s a surprising blunder to see Pat McCrory pledging to “turn around” pay-to-play politics at a place like Wilmington’s Break Time Billiards &amp; Grille.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/02/09/lod-mccrorys-opening-miscue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Two Nasties, One Target</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/01/31/lod-two-nasties-one-target/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/01/31/lod-two-nasties-one-target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizens United Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a strategy to simultaneously fight nasty political money and the nasty political ads they buy: Go after the broadcasters and make them pull any ad not completely substantiated with hard evidence. As a media expert explains, independent ads don’t enjoy the same protection from a broadcaster’s good-taste test as ads produced by candidates during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a strategy to simultaneously fight nasty political money and the nasty political ads they buy: Go after the broadcasters and make them pull any ad not completely substantiated with hard evidence. As a <strong><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/01/29/opinion/jamieson-tame-super-pacs/index.html">media expert explains</a></strong>, independent ads don’t enjoy the same protection from a broadcaster’s good-taste test as ads produced by candidates during the election season. Independent groups escape many campaign finance regulations because they’re technically not connected to the candidate. So why not use this distinction to insist that their ads get treated like non-campaign ads and are pulled when they cross the line with exaggerated claims and accusations. Here’s another strategy being tried in the high octane Senate race in Massachusetts. Sen. Scott Brown (R) and challenger Elizabeth Warren (D) have <strong><a href="http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view.bg?articleid=1398120">signed an unusual agreement</a></strong> that they will give a charity half the cost of any third-party’s ad attacking his or her opponent – and they’re telling outside groups from Karl Rove’s American Crossroads to the League of Conservation Voters to back off and let the candidates handle their own messaging, with the piles of money their raising themselves. Definitely a model worth watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/01/31/lod-two-nasties-one-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LOD: Pope&#8217;s Blessing</title>
		<link>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/01/26/lod-popes-blessing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/01/26/lod-popes-blessing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link-of-the-Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Feed & Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money in Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/?p=2496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An editorial writer for the Raleigh News &#38; Observer handed Art Pope a bevy of compliments for his “humanitarian” philanthropy, extolling the list of “charities and universities the Pope Foundation blessed with $1.2 million in grants last year.” Alliance Medical Ministries &#8211; $10,000; Barium Springs Home for Children &#8211; $10,000; Blessed Sacrament School &#8211; $10,000; etc. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An editorial writer for the Raleigh <em>News &amp; Observer</em> handed Art Pope a <strong><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/01/20/1790656/lets-not-demonize-art-pope.html">bevy of compliments</a></strong> for his “humanitarian” philanthropy, extolling the list of “charities and universities the Pope Foundation blessed with $1.2 million in grants last year.” Alliance Medical Ministries &#8211; $10,000; Barium Springs Home for Children &#8211; $10,000; Blessed Sacrament School &#8211; $10,000; etc. The writer, Burgetta Wheeler, managed this sweet story by cherry picking from the list of foundation recipients and committing the “one dimensional” journalism she ascribes to Pope’s detractors. Here’s a <strong><a href="http://www.democracy-nc.org/downloads/PopeFdn2010.pdf">link to the complete list</a></strong> (pp. 20-23). A balanced story would have noted that the Pope Foundation gave a whopping $1.35 million to the strident rightwing group Americans for Prosperity in the same fiscal year, more than the combined total of Wheeler’s featured grantees. Or how does Pope’s giving to the goody-good list compare to one gift for college sports &#8211; $1,000,000 to UNC’s Rams Club, cleverly named The Educational Foundation Inc. Other unmentionables for the year: John Locke Foundation &#8211; $2.6 million; Civitas Institute &#8211; $1.2 million; NC Institute for Constitutional Law &#8211; $710,000; Pope Center for Higher Education &#8211; $542,800; NC Family Policy Council &#8211; $100,000; Job Creators Alliance &#8211; $100,000; NC Free Enterprise Foundation &#8211; $95,000; Heritage Foundation &#8211; $50,000. To shore up the foundation’s cash flow, Art and sister Amanda each donated $3.5 million, presumably from their share of earnings from Variety Wholesalers (Roses, Maxway, Super Dollar). An LOD account of previous foundation donations is <strong><a href="http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2011/09/30/lod-the-40-million-dollar-man/">here</a></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.democracy-nc.org/news/blog/2012/01/26/lod-popes-blessing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

